Persistent Recurrent Memory Between Transformer Layers Improves Language Model Generalization¶
L1 topology reference kernel; no full TinyStories training curves.
Paper information¶
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Paper | Persistent Recurrent Memory Between Transformer Layers Improves Language Model Generalization |
| Institution | FITec Labs / Ericsson São Paulo (first author). |
| First public release | 2026-09-15 (arXiv v1) |
| Author code | No public author repository found as of 2026-09-16. |
| Local adapter or method key | persistent-recurrent-memory |
| Local reproduction code | src/auto_research/foundation_latest_20260916_followup.py |
Paper method and evidence¶
Insert an observe–GRU update–gated influence state path between the lower and upper Transformer halves, so recurrent memory affects later computation.
flowchart LR
L[Lower Transformer layers] --> O[Observe hidden state]
O --> R[GRU updates persistent memory]
R --> G[Gate influence on upper layers]
Original paper figure¶
Figure 1 shows the recurrent path between Transformer stages. From the original paper; copyright remains with the authors.
Core equation¶
The reference preserves the state transition and gate and exposes auditable statistics.
Reported results¶
Paper accuracy, speed, training losses and benchmarks are not local results.
Local reproduction¶
Three-seed mechanism results are diagnostic_only=true. Fixed-budget fixtures verify the defining operator and auditable intermediate states; they are not a benchmark, production result, or capability-ranking entry.
