跳转至

VAD: Visual evidence attribution for multimodal on-policy distillation

简体中文

Isolated counterfactual target reconstruction. Candidate process-quality scores proxy evidence-present/removed views; no 4B/9B multimodal model reproduction.

Paper information

Field Details
Paper Paper or original source
Institution Shanghai Jiao Tong University / Xiaohongshu / CUHK / Zhejiang University / Southeast University
First public release 2026-07-30
Author code Yes: author implementation and model weights.
Local adapter or method key vad
Local reproduction code src/auto_research/post_training/

Paper method and evidence

Privileged-view matching mixes visual evidence, language priors and teacher bias. VAD runs the same frozen teacher with and without relevant evidence; the centered log-probability difference is a signed visual direction. Project the original correction onto this direction with a one-sided constraint, then rebuild the target around the student's current distribution. The full privileged teacher remains only a weak regularizer.

flowchart LR
  A[Teacher with and without visual evidence] --> B[Centered evidence direction]
  B[Centered evidence direction] --> C[One-sided projection]
  C[One-sided projection] --> D[Student-anchored target]

Original paper figure

VAD paper figure

Figure 5 shows the flow of evidence views and target construction. From the original paper; copyright remains with the authors.

Core equation

\[ r_t=\phi_t(p_T^+)-\phi_t(p_S^0),\quad u_t=\phi_t(p_T^+)-\phi_t(p_T^-),\quad \beta_t=\frac{[\langle r_t,u_t\rangle]_+}{\lVert u_t\rVert_2^2+\zeta}, \]
\[ q_{T,t}=\operatorname{softmax}\!\left(\phi_t(p_S^0)+\operatorname{clip}(\beta_tu_t,-c,c)\right). \]

Reported results

Across six visual benchmarks, Qwen3.5-4B Full VAD averages 78.32 vs 75.92 for direct privileged teacher matching. At 9B it also beats Vision-OPD and visual-advantage weighting. No production A/B.

Local reproduction

Implements two frozen teacher forwards, centered log-probability differences, one-sided projection, supporting/refuting branch budgets, student-anchored targets, symmetric JSD and 0.1-weighted weak teacher regularization. Logs projection, evidence norm, budgets and correction alignment. GSM8K candidate seed 42 accuracy goes 0.1719→0.7969 (+363.64% from pre-training), reward 0.3124→0.8153 and reference KL 0.0092. Over 120 updates projection activates 100% with mean alignment 0.5145. This is candidate-policy mechanism evidence, not visual benchmark lift. Fixed-seed metrics. No Qwen3.5 training, image crops, visual top-100 token support or six official benchmarks.

auto-research post-train --algorithm vad --dataset gsm8k-candidate --maximum-examples 256 --steps 120 --seed 42
auto-research evolve --model post-training --dataset gsm8k-candidate --direction "Compare VAD with other OPD target reconstruction methods" --generations 2 --population 4