跳转至

LLM-Based Re-Ranking for Real Estate Search

简体中文

Fidelity: core mechanism. Paper results, local public-data measurements, and omissions are separate.

Paper information

Field Details
Paper arXiv 2607.14835
Organization QuintoAndar
First public release 2026-07-16 (arXiv v1)
Authors' code The paper did not provide official or author code when checked on 2026-08-24.
Adapter / method real-estate-rerank
Local reproduction code src/auto_research/reproductions/real_estate_rerank/

Original paper

Motivation and method

Pass conversational requirements, structured listing attributes, text descriptions, and candidate-set statistics to an LLM reranker. Cross-candidate comparison complements local relevance from vector retrieval.

flowchart LR
 A["Conversation and user profile"] --> B["Candidate-set LLM reranker"] --> C["Listing order"]

Key figure from the paper

LLM-Based Re-Ranking for Real Estate Search — Figure 4

Figure 4: Overall workflow, key stages, and data flow. From the original paper; copyright remains with the authors.

Core equations

\[ s_i=f_\theta(q,p_u,x_i,\operatorname{Agg}(X)) \]

Paper results

The main production A/B evidence is CTR +5.30%. Offline tables and online metrics use private or paper-specific protocols. The private paper protocol is not directly comparable with local MovieLens measurements.

Local reproduction

Local comparison: The baseline is the shared transition + content scorer. The treatment adds only real-estate-rerank on the same users, items, full-catalog candidates, and seed.

MovieLens-100K, 220 users and 360 items, seed 42: NDCG@10 0.0540 → 0.0496 (-8.21%); Hit@10 0.1091 → 0.1000. Validation selects mixture weights only; the test set is not used for tuning.

auto-research reproduce --paper real-estate-rerank --dataset-dir data --seed 42

See the fixed metrics.

Reproduction boundaries

The core mechanism runs on MovieLens-100K with the same split, fixed full-catalog candidates, and seed. Private features, the production foundation model, and online traffic are unavailable. The implementation has independent model state and scoring, rather than mapping a paper name to a shared weighted formula. Omitted parts are in the adapter's omitted_core_components. Local changes and paper A/B gains are reported separately.