跳转至

Sixteen Google-priority items: low-cost component delivery

简体中文

This round implements exactly 16 accepted follow-ups from the previous 39-item review, not 16 new publications or full reproductions. The historical review snapshot is unchanged; a new ledger batch records component delivery.

Delivered scope

Paper / component Actual delivery Verification boundary
Dynamic Cogeneration BRT original defect failure, patched pass, and grouped patch selection Real subprocesses, manual patch; no LLM repair
ME-POIs Multiscale Gaussian prior and contrastive/KL/text objectives A100 tensor and gradient fixture; no private mobility data
Attribution Sets v1 formula-level risk estimation and finite-candidate ERM Retained finite-sample counterexample to printed formula; unbiasedness not verified
CausalArmor LOO likelihood attribution and masking/regeneration interface Real 0.5B likelihood on A100; no safety accuracy
Spatial Ads Grouped pseudo-disk LP and randomized rounding CPU math subproblem, not full matching/payment/PTAS
ConvApparel PLSA statistics, HLS, and cross-policy validation CPU diagnostic classifier is not Gemini; no human data collection
Modular Robust Generative Globally constrained primal-dual, SIR, and router objectives A100 finite support; residual did not converge in 16 steps; not robustness capability
Data Quality LSA LSA initialization, rollout, closed-form SFT, and OS objective A100 formulas and gradients; OS is regression, not policy-gradient RL
POLCA Epsilon-net and search history containing inputs and outputs CPU callback fixtures; no LLM program optimization
Simula Taxonomy, complexity expansion, independent dual critics, and complexity protocol Injectable model interface with zero model calls; not a data quality result
TFRBench MASE, reference construction, and isolated held-out predictions Reference construction reads labels and is not leakage-free capability evidence
ProEval Empirical GP/BQ and failure-set capture CPU historical score fixture; no rerun of LLM evaluation
mild Margin logistic objective, gradients, and router CPU mathematical training; inference does not read answers/costs
ScientistOne CoE evidence binding, score rechecks, CPR, and audit interface Missing semantic/citation evidence stays unverified
Activation Model Scanner 48 official input pairs, activation directions, layer scans, and structural comparison 96 real A100 forward passes; no independent baseline or safety certification
HCRG Python AST graph/skeleton, three hops, dependency order, and static metrics Not tree-sitter plus Gemini Java migration

The scope manifest records evidence, full-experiment status, and costs. component_only and evaluation_protocol_interface are not full_pipeline. All are diagnostic_only=true, with no capability gain or evolve integration.

Full experiments

Full multi-data, multi-model, paid-API, multi-seed, or private-data experiments are not reproduced (review DONE) and not automatically retried. ME-POIs documents its unavailable private data. Spatial Ads is theoretical, with no full training experiment; do not invent a cost decision to fill the table. These statuses are independent of component delivery.

Cross-review fixes

  • HCRG stops guessing unimported short names across modules and keeps parameter/local shadows unresolved.
  • POLCA history includes inputs and program outputs, not just scores and text.
  • AMS reads hidden_states[block+1] for official zero-indexed blocks, verified by a real small Transformer hook and rerun on A100.
  • Robust gating separates theoretical KL from practical adversary NLL; symmetric entropy fixtures must not hide the distinction.
  • Attribution Sets keeps the v1 printed formula and independent finite-sample counterexample, without silently rewriting the equation to pass.

Early/intermediate runs stay separate from final acceptance. Receipt status “passed” covers only specified mechanisms, execution, and provenance, not capability, safety, or optimality.

Checks

PYTHONPATH=src python scripts/closeout_google16_components.py --check
python -m pytest tests/test_google16_*.py
python scripts/validate_gpu_evidence.py

The earlier table saying 16 items were unimplemented remains the review snapshot from that date. This round did not run a new cross-domain scan or advance the 2026-10-15 watermark.